翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Lisowo, Koszalin County
・ Lisowo, Podlaskie Voivodeship
・ Lisowo, Stargard County
・ Lisowo-Janówek
・ Lisowola
・ Lisowski
・ Lisp
・ Lisp (band)
・ Lisp (disambiguation)
・ Lisp (programming language)
・ LISP 2
・ Lisp Algebraic Manipulator
・ Lisp in Small Pieces
・ Lisp machine
・ Lisp Machine Lisp
Lisp Machines
・ Lisp reader
・ Lisp-based Intelligent Software Agents
・ Lispe
・ Lispenard-Rodman-Davenport House
・ Lispeszentadorján
・ Lispeth
・ Lispkit Lisp
・ LispMe
・ Lispocephala
・ Lispocephala alma
・ Lispocephala brachialis
・ Lispole
・ LispWorks
・ LISRAM Highway


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Lisp Machines : ウィキペディア英語版
Lisp Machines

Lisp Machines, Inc. was a company formed in 1979 by Richard Greenblatt of MIT's Artificial Intelligence Laboratory to build Lisp machines. It was based in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
By 1979, the Lisp Machine Project at MIT, originated and headed by Greenblatt, had constructed over 30 CADR computers
for various projects at MIT. It was evident that it was time for the project to move from a university research to a company setting.
Russell Noftsker, who had formerly been administrator of the MIT Artificial Intelligence lab some years previously and who had
since started and run a small company, was convinced that computers based on the artificial intelligence language LISP had a bright future commercially. There were a number of ready customers who were anxious to get machines similar to ones they had seen at MIT.
Greenblatt and Noftsker had differing ideas about the structure and financing of the proposed company. Greenblatt believed
the company could be "bootstrapped", i.e. financed practically from scratch from the order flow from customers (some of whom
were willing to pay in advance). This would mean that the principals of the company would retain control. Noftsker favored
a more conventional venture capital model, raising a considerable sum of money, but with the investors having control
of the company. The two negotiated at length, but neither would compromise.
The ensuing discussions of the choice rent the lab into two factions. In February, 1979, matters came to a head. Greenblatt believed that the proceeds from the construction and sale of a few machines could be profitably reinvested in the funding of the company. Most sided with Noftsker, believing that a commercial venture fund-backed company had a better chance of surviving and commercializing Lisp Machines than Greenblatt's proposed self-sustaining start-up. They went on to start Symbolics Inc.
Alexander Jacobson, a consultant from CDC, was trying to put together an AI natural language computer application, came to Greenblatt, seeking a Lisp machine for his group to work with. Eight months after Greenblatt had his disastrous conference with Noftsker, he had yet to produce anything. Alexander Jacobson decided that the only way Greenblatt was going to actually start his company and build the Lisp machines that Jacobson needed, was if he pushed and financially helped Greenblatt launch his company. Jacobson pulled together business plans, a board, and a partner, F. Stephen Wyle, for Greenblatt. The newfound company was named ''LISP Machine, Inc.'' (LMI), and was funded mostly by order flow including CDC orders, via Jacobson.
==Folklore about LMI==
The following parable-like story is told about LMI by Steven Levy and used for the first time in ''Hackers: Heroes of the Computer Revolution'' (1984). Levy's account of hackers is in large part based on the values of the hackers at MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory. Among these hackers was Richard Stallman, whom Levy at the time called the last true hacker.
When Noftsker started Symbolics, while he was able to pay salaries, he didn't actually have a building or any equipment for the programmers to work on. He bargained with Patrick Winston that, in exchange for allowing Symbolics' staff to keep working out of MIT, Symbolics would let MIT use internally and freely all the software Symbolics developed. Unfortunately this openness would later lead to accusations of intellectual property theft.
In the late 1970s and early 1980s, to prevent software from being used on their competitors' computers, most manufacturers stopped distributing source code and began using copyright and restrictive software licenses to limit or prohibit copying and redistribution. Such proprietary software had existed before, but this shift in the legal characteristics of software can be regarded as a consequence triggered by the U.S. Copyright Act of 1976, as stated by MIT fellow Brewster Kahle.〔 around the 46th minute〕
While both companies delivered proprietary software, Richard Stallman believed that LMI, unlike Symbolics, had tried to avoid hurting the lab. Stallman had proclaimed that "the prospect of charging money for software was a crime against humanity." He clarified, years later, that it is blocking the user's freedom that he believes is a "crime", not the act of charging for a copy of the software.
Symbolics had recruited most of the remaining MIT hackers including notable hacker Bill Gosper, who then left the AI Lab. Symbolics forced Greenblatt to also resign at the AI lab, by citing MIT policies. So for two years at the MIT AI Lab, from 1982 to the end of 1983, Stallman singlehandedly duplicated the efforts of the Symbolics programmers, in order to prevent them from gaining a monopoly on the lab's computers.
Although LMI was able to benefit from Stallman's freely available code, he was the last of his generation of hackers at the lab. Later programmers would have to sign non-disclosure agreements not to share source code or technical information with other software developers.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Lisp Machines」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.